Skip to content

How Can We Miss You…

09 April 2010 @ 10:57

…if you won’t go away…Michael Steele.

This man has been an embarrassment since he took office as head of the Republican National Committee.  If he breathes on you, you smell leather because he has put his foot in his mouth so many times. 

Mr. Steele seems like a nice enough fellow and I used to enjoy it when he substituted for Sean Hannity on the old Hannity & Colmes and needled Alan ‘The Annoying Nimrod’ Colmes, but it now seems as if The Peter Principle has come into play in his case.

Michael Steele should do the honorable thing and, figuratively, retire to his den and take the dusty Luger out of its case.

The final straw for me was his comment on Good Morning America, as reported on the show’s blog [I didn’t even know about comment made by him earlier to Washingtonian Magazine]:

The embattled chairman played the race card today when asked on “Good Morning America” if he has a slimmer margin of error because he is African American.

“The honest answer is, ‘yes,'” he said. “Barack Obama has a slimmer margin. A lot of folks do. It’s a different role for me to play and others to play and that’s just the reality of it. But you take that as part of the nature of it.”

“My view on politics is much more grassroots oriented, it’s not old boy network oriented, so I tend to, you know, come at it a little bit stronger, a little bit more street-wise, if you will. That’s rubbed some feathers the wrong way,” Steele told “GMA’s” George Stephanopoulos.

Today’s “GMA” interview is not the first time Steele has asserted that his race plays a role in the criticism he has faced as RNC chairman. During a recent interview with Washingtonian Magazine, which took place before the sex-club controversy, Steele said, “I don’t see stories about internal operations of the DNC that I see about this operation. Why? Is it because Michael Steele is the chairman, or is it because a black man is chairman?”

Over at the great Legal Insurrection, William Jacobson comments:

…Granted, Steele did not raise the issue and was responding to a question in which the “thinner [sic] margins” terminology was used, but Steele adopted the language by answering in the affirmative.

Such comments do infinitely more damage than any excessive spending ever could do. Suggesting racial motivations in others merely because they disagree with you has become the dominant theme of the attacks on opponents of Obamacare.

By using the race card himself, Steele has given indirect aid and comfort to those behind the smears of the Tea Party movement.

Steele needs to man up, argue on the merits, and stop whining. But most of all, stop with the race card crap; that’s the Democrats’ game.

The Prof pretty much sums-up my feelings on Mr. Steele, but he doesn’t go far enough…

Michael Steele must go — he has, obviously, risen to his level of incompetence.

3 Comments
  1. 09 April 2010 @ 13:57 13:57

    Mmm yeah, I have to agree. Albeit for different reasons.

    Steele is not grassroots. His positions on some of the thornier problems that are causing division within the GOP, like deficit spending and illegal immigration, generally strike me as formulated out of a calculation to avoid additional friction. They come off as unprincipled, whether I agree with them or not.

    It’s as if he cannot afford to have the right enemies, because he does enough damage to himself before anyone else gets to him. Which is especially damning, because it means his clumsiness compromises his ability to stand up for what’s right. It obstructs the communication pipeline between the party structure and the grassroots passion that could put it over the top in November.

    On the other hand, since that is his glaring weakness it should help him out mightily to pick up Sarah Palin’s support. I’m gonna file that one under “good for him, bad for her.” My impression at this time is she’s just done something that is going to be recalled later as a mistake…although I could be wrong.

  2. 09 April 2010 @ 17:26 17:26

    Well, I hear you, but I’m rather with the Prof. Yeah, so Steele has shoe-polish breath. On the other hand, he does listen to the grass roots – that being a rare and important virtue. I also like the man’s energy. I think he gets it.

    My real question – the important question – is about Steele’s election smarts. Can he deliver libertarian-conservative candidates and libertarian-conservative votes? On that I simply don’t know yet.

  3. 10 April 2010 @ 09:45 09:45

    This post linked at Reaganite Republican… good stuff, Mr B:

    http://reaganiterepublicanresistance.blogspot.com/2010/04/ascendant-new-media-right-speaks.html

Comments are closed.